DeepSeek: Origins, Architecture & Hosting
Disruptive model with global legal challenges
Welcome to Silicon Sands News, read across all 50 states in the US and 111 countries.
We are excited to present our latest editions on how responsible investment shapes AI's future, emphasizing the OECD AI Principles. We're not just investing in companies. We're investing in a vision where AI technologies are developed and deployed responsibly and ethically, benefiting all of humanity.
This week, we will explore the confusion around DeepSeek and try to provide some clarity
Let’s Dive Into It . .
TL;DR:
DeepSeek-R1 has garnered significant attention in the AI community for its ability to solve advanced reasoning tasks and the controversies surrounding its data usage and intellectual property practices. While proprietary large language models (LLMs) like GPT-4 and LLaMA remain secretive about their architectural and training details, DeepSeek offers transparency, making it a compelling case study in open-source AI development. Central to DeepSeek’s identity is its integration of a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework within a transformer architecture, coupled with Multi-Head Latent Attention (MLA) for handling exceptionally long prompts. This design allows the model to achieve state-of-the-art performance on math and logic benchmarks. However, debates over its training data and intellectual property practices highlight broader challenges in open AI development.
This week, we trace DeepSeek’s origins, explain its architectural innovations, detail its multi-stage training pipeline emphasizing reinforcement learning, and examine its licensing terms for hosted and non-hosted versions. A key focus is the updated clause in its Terms of Service. It states that user data submitted to DeepSeek’s hosted services will be transferred to servers in China and may be used at DeepSeek’s discretion. This raises concerns about data privacy, global regulatory compliance, and potential misuse. …..Not to mention a national security nightmare.
Origins and Rationale
DeepSeek emerged from recognizing that many existing LLMs, though impressive in conversation and text generation, struggled with systematic problem-solving tasks. Dense transformers like GPT-3 and LLaMA showed remarkable fluency but lacked depth in reasoning unless carefully prompted. DeepSeek’s team hypothesized that reinforcement learning, combined with a specialized MoE architecture, would teach a model to tackle intricate tasks systematically. Earlier experiments under DeepSeek-V1 and DeepSeek-V2 confirmed that standard dense transformers often plateaued in challenging domains without extensive human fine-tuning.
By embedding a Mixture-of-Experts approach, developers expanded parameter capacity to 671 billion while activating only 37 billion parameters per token. This arrangement allowed for domain-specific knowledge storage without computational strain. Multi-Head Latent Attention was introduced to compress key-value caches, enabling sequences as long as 128,000 tokens. These innovations fit within the transformer structure of self-attention and feed-forward layers, preserving the transformer’s strengths while overcoming memory and efficiency hurdles.
Yes, It’s a Transformer Model
Despite its distinctive features, DeepSeek-R1 remains a transformer at heart. Transformers revolutionized natural language processing by replacing recurrent or convolution-based methods with self-attention, enabling parallel processing of token relationships. Traditional transformer implementations rely on multi-head attention, feed-forward layers, positional embeddings, layer normalization, and residual connections. DeepSeek retains these elements but implements crucial modifications to handle massive parameters and long contexts. Mixture-of-Experts ensures sparse activation patterns, while Multi-Head Latent Attention reworks key-value storage for memory efficiency. These additions preserve the fundamental principles of the transformer, such as query-key-value operations and attention score computation.
A Key Innovation Lies In Unique Combination of Existing Technologies
One of DeepSeek’s key departures from standard transformers is its extensive use of a mixture of experts (MoE). Dense transformers apply the same parameters to every token, while MoE divides parameters into specialized subnetworks (experts). A gating mechanism selects which subset of experts processes a given token during a forward pass. Although DeepSeek boasts 671 billion parameters, only about 37 billion activate per token, mitigating memory and compute overhead. This arrangement allows the model to store domain-specific knowledge (e.g., math, coding) without straining resources. Experts can be routed to specific tasks, such as theorem-proving for math queries or programming patterns for code debugging.
This approach offers several benefits, including reduced memory usage and computational efficiency comparable to smaller dense models. However, routing and balancing experts introduce training complexity, requiring careful gate design and load balancing. DeepSeek overcame these challenges by refining strategies from prior MoE research, such as Google’s Switch Transformer, and open-sourcing a stable implementation for large-scale training.
Transformers can handle long sequences, but memory consumption balloons due to key-value storage requirements. DeepSeek introduced Multi-Head Latent Attention (MLA) to compress these caches, enabling 128,000-token context windows. MLA preserves standard attention practices but compresses key-value pairs into a latent representation, reducing memory usage by 80–95% in long-sequence scenarios. This optimization allows users to feed extensive problem statements or codebases into a single inference call, making DeepSeek a powerful platform for advanced reasoning.
DeepSeek’s architecture invites comparisons to leading transformer-based LLMs like LLaMA, GPT, and Falcon. Meta’s LLaMA focuses on a dense transformer with up to 70B parameters, while Falcon employs a dense structure with 40B parameters and multi-query attention for speed. OpenAI’s GPT-3 and GPT-4 remain proprietary, with GPT-4 offering a 32k context version. DeepSeek stands out with its MoE-based system and 128k token window, positioning it as a cutting-edge alternative for long-form reasoning. Its training data is more targeted, focusing on problem-solving tasks rather than broad corpora, often yielding better performance on specialized benchmarks.
Are You Ready To Implement AI?
DeepSeek’s training pipeline emphasizes reinforcement learning, which permeates every stage, from initial fine-tuning to chain-of-thought generation. The model was trained on tasks with automatically verifiable answers, with correct solutions yielding positive rewards. Rejection sampling was used to filter out suboptimal outputs, retaining only high-quality solutions for further training. This approach structurally integrates reasoning into the model, making it a robust problem-solving agent.
The full 671B-parameter MoE model is computationally heavy, even with sparse activation. To broaden accessibility, DeepSeek introduced a knowledge distillation framework, where the largest model generates solutions for smaller “student” models (7B or 32B parameters). These distilled variants run on fewer GPUs with reduced latency, making DeepSeek’s reasoning capabilities more widely accessible. Some community members have fine-tuned these models for domain-specific tasks, proving the effectiveness of distillation.
Did DeepSeek Distill OpenAI Models?
Model distillation has emerged as a powerful technique for enhancing the accessibility and efficiency of large language models (LLMs). DeepSeek unabashedly leverages this technique to create smaller, more efficient models by distilling knowledge from larger and more complex architectures—notably, those developed by OpenAI, such as GPT-4 and GPT -3.5. This approach democratizes access to advanced AI capabilities and raises significant questions about intellectual property, data usage, and the ethical implications of such practices.
Model distillation involves transferring knowledge from a large, often cumbersome model—the "teacher"—into a smaller, more agile model, the "student." This technique makes AI more accessible, allowing for deploying sophisticated models in resource-constrained environments, such as mobile devices or smaller servers. DeepSeek-R1 has utilized this method extensively, creating a series of distilled models that inherit the reasoning capabilities of their larger counterparts while requiring significantly fewer computational resources.
At the heart of DeepSeek's distillation process lies its innovative architectural design and advanced training methodologies. By employing knowledge distillation, the model captures the essence of the teacher model's reasoning patterns and transfers them to smaller models. This is achieved through a meticulous process involving aligning the intermediate layers of the student model with those of the teacher, ensuring that the smaller model learns the critical features and representations that make the more prominent model effective. Additionally, quantization and progressive compression are employed to further reduce the model's size, making it feasible for deployment in various settings.
One of the most notable aspects of DeepSeek's approach is its use of advanced quantization methods. By carefully calibrating the precision of different layers within the model, DeepSeek achieves a balance between model size and performance. For instance, particular layers may be quantized to lower precision to reduce memory usage, while others are retained at higher precision to preserve critical functionalities. This selective quantization ensures that the distilled models maintain a high level of accuracy despite their reduced size.
DeepSeek-R1's distilled models have demonstrated impressive performance across various benchmarks, particularly in tasks requiring advanced reasoning and problem-solving skills. In mathematical reasoning tasks, for example, they have been shown to achieve accuracy levels comparable to, and in some cases surpassing, those of OpenAI's models. This is a testament to the effectiveness of DeepSeek's distillation process, which successfully captures the reasoning patterns of the teacher model and transfers them to the student model.
These distilled models have a significant advantage in computational efficiency. While OpenAI's GPT-4 and GPT-3.5 require substantial computational resources to operate effectively, DeepSeek's distilled models can function efficiently on less powerful hardware. This makes them particularly appealing for organizations and developers who seek to leverage advanced AI capabilities without the associated high costs.
Despite the technological prowess demonstrated by DeepSeek's distillation process, the practice has not been without controversy. Central to these debates are allegations that DeepSeek has utilized proprietary data and models, including those developed by OpenAI, without proper authorization. OpenAI has publicly accused DeepSeek of incorporating outputs from its GPT models into the training data of DeepSeek-R1, raising concerns about intellectual property rights and the ethical use of proprietary information.
In response to these allegations, DeepSeek has maintained that its distillation process is based on publicly available data and that the knowledge transferred to its distilled models is general, thereby not infringing on OpenAI's intellectual property.
The question is: Does this fall under the same ‘Fair Use’ claim that OpenAI makes about the data it uses to train these models? Is this hypocrisy at its finest?
Model distillation raises several regulatory and ethical questions, with data privacy and intellectual property rights at the forefront of these discussions. While distillation enables the creation of smaller, more efficient models, it also poses challenges regarding transparency and accountability. Questions about the ownership of distilled knowledge and the potential for misuse of proprietary data underscore the need for clear guidelines and regulations governing the practice.
Furthermore, the ethical implications of model distillation extend beyond legal concerns. The concentration of AI capabilities in the hands of a few large corporations has long been a topic of discussion, and the rise of open-source models like DeepSeek-R1 offers both opportunities and challenges in this regard. While these models democratize access to advanced AI technologies, they also risk perpetuating biases and privacy violations inherent in the training data of larger models.
Leading AI researchers and industry analysts have offered mixed assessments of DeepSeek's distillation practices. While some have praised the technological advancements and the potential for increased accessibility, others have raised concerns about the ethical and legal implications. The broader AI community is keenly aware of the delicate balance between innovation and responsibility. DeepSeek's distillation practices serve as a focal point for discussions on how to navigate this landscape.
Looking ahead, the future of model distillation appears promising. Advances in quantization techniques, architectural innovations, and the growing volume of publicly available data are expected to enhance distilled models' efficiency and performance. As these technologies evolve, the potential for AI to be deployed in diverse settings, from education to healthcare, becomes increasingly tangible. However, as the field progresses, addressing the accompanying challenges with a commitment to transparency, accountability, and ethical practices will be crucial.
DeepSeek-R1's model distillation practices represent a significant leap forward in AI technology, offering a pathway to more accessible and efficient AI solutions. Distilling knowledge from larger models into smaller, more agile architectures can democratize access to advanced AI capabilities, making them available to a broader range of users and applications. However, this achievement is not without its challenges, as questions surrounding intellectual property, data privacy, and ethical practices continue to loom large. As the AI community moves forward, the lessons learned from DeepSeek's distillation practices will play a pivotal role in shaping the future of AI development—one that a commitment to innovation, responsibility, and ethical stewardship must guide.
DeepSeek’s Terms of Use
DeepSeek is distributed under a permissive open-source license, allowing modification, redistribution, and commercial use.
However, its hosted API has raised concerns due to its updated Terms of Service, which state that user data submitted to the service will be transferred to servers in China and may be used at DeepSeek’s discretion. This has led to regulatory probes concerning GDPR compliance and cross-border data transfers in Italy and Belgium. Organizations bound by data protection laws may violate regulations by sending sensitive information to a service that transfers data to China. Similarly, the mass-released app for iPhone and Andriod has similar terms of use, claiming rights to all data it touches, including audio, video, images, text, etc. This is an issue regardless of where the information is being sent.
The clause allowing DeepSeek to use user-submitted data under its terms of use poses significant risks, including data privacy violations, intellectual property exposure, and security challenges. Organizations may inadvertently transfer proprietary documents to servers in China, raising legal and compliance issues. Experts warn that confidential data could be misused or leaked, especially given China’s cybersecurity laws requiring companies to cooperate with government requests.
DeepSeek-R1: A Comprehensive Comparison and Analysis
DeepSeek-R1 is a significant achievement in open-source AI. It integrates transformative architectural innovations to excel in advanced reasoning tasks. This paper delves into its architecture, training, and implications, comparing it with leading models like LLaMA 3.3, GPT-o1, Claude Sonnet 3.5, and TII Falcon. It also explores regulatory, financial, and strategic considerations.
DeepSeek-R1 employs a multi-stage pipeline emphasizing reinforcement learning (RL) and rejection sampling, allowing it to generate its training data. This reduces reliance on human annotation and fosters systematic problem-solving. LLaMA 3.3 uses supervised fine-tuning and RLHF, emphasizing alignment with human preferences. GPT-o1 integrates chain-of-thought prompting, enhancing its reasoning capabilities through extended thinking phases. Claude Sonnet 3.5 leverages vision-language training, enabling image interpretation. TII Falcon trains on RefinedWeb, optimizing for inference speed and efficiency.
Regulatory and Legal Implications
DeepSeek's hosted API transfers data to servers in China, which raises significant concerns under data privacy regulations like GDPR and HIPAA. This practice could violate these regulations, as they often require data to remain within specific jurisdictions or ensure stricter safeguards for cross-border transfers. In contrast, models like LLaMA 3.3 and TII Falcon offer more control over data. Falcon emphasizes privacy through local deployment options that allow users to maintain control over their data within their infrastructure.
Intellectual property exposure is another critical issue. DeepSeek's terms of service allow the company to use user-submitted data for any purpose, which could expose proprietary information. If a user uploads sensitive documents or code, DeepSeek could integrate this data into its training processes or share it with affiliates, resulting in a loss of intellectual property protection. Open-source models like LLaMA and Falcon mitigate this risk by using permissive licenses that ensure user data control and reduce the likelihood of unauthorized use.
From a compliance perspective, TII Falcon's Apache 2.0 license makes it more enterprise-friendly. It aligns with regulatory standards and ensures companies can adopt the model without violating legal requirements. Conversely, DeepSeek's cross-border data transfers may conflict with local laws, particularly in regions with stringent data sovereignty regulations. This could complicate enterprise adoption and raise compliance challenges for organizations using DeepSeek's hosted services.
Implications for Stakeholders
Founders
Founders can leverage DeepSeek-R1 as a powerful tool for building innovative solutions. The model's permissive open-source license allows for extensive customization and redistribution, making it an attractive option for startups seeking to differentiate their products. Using DeepSeek as a teacher model, founders can train smaller, specialized models tailored to specific industry needs, reducing the reliance on considerable computational resources and enabling agile development cycles.
Another significant advantage is the freedom to create derivatives. Unlike some proprietary models, DeepSeek's license does not restrict modifications or commercial use, encouraging founders to innovate and adapt the model to their unique business requirements. This flexibility allows for the creation of customized solutions that can enhance a company's competitiveness in the market.
Moreover, DeepSeek's open-source nature offers transparency. Founders can audit and modify the model's architecture to align with business goals. This level of control is invaluable for ensuring that the model integrates seamlessly into existing infrastructure and meets the needs of their target audience.
However, founders must also be aware of the associated risks. Data privacy and regulatory compliance are critical concerns, particularly with DeepSeek's hosted API, which transfers data to China. Conflicts with regulations such as GDPR or HIPAA could result in legal issues and reputational damage. Navigating these challenges is essential to maintaining trust and ensuring compliance.
Additionally, there is a risk of intellectual property disputes. If DeepSeek's training data includes proprietary information without proper authorization, it could expose founders to legal challenges. Ensuring all data usage complies with relevant laws and regulations is crucial to avoiding such pitfalls.
Lastly, DeepSeek's hosted API's multi-tenant nature poses risks related to data contamination or unintended interactions between different users' data. Founders must implement measures to safeguard data integrity and reliability, ensuring the model's outputs remain accurate and trustworthy.
Investors
Investors can capitalize on the opportunities presented by DeepSeek-R1's open-source framework. By supporting startups that leverage DeepSeek's cost-effective and flexible architecture, investors can achieve higher returns on investment. The model democratizes access to advanced AI technology, fostering a competitive environment that can drive innovation and market growth.
DeepSeek's open-source nature also promotes transparency and community-driven innovation, which can accelerate technological advancements and create new market opportunities. Investors who back such projects can position themselves at the forefront of these innovations, benefiting from early-mover advantages and potential significant returns.
The ability to train specialized models using DeepSeek as a teacher reduces reliance on expensive, proprietary solutions. This cost efficiency can lead to higher profit margins and greater scalability for investee companies, making them more attractive for further investment. As these companies grow and scale, they will likely attract additional funding and partnerships, further enhancing their value.
However, investors must also be cautious about the risks associated with DeepSeek. Intellectual property risks, particularly those concerning data usage, could lead to legal disputes and affect the valuation and viability of investee companies. Proper compliance and legal safeguards are essential for mitigating these risks and protecting investments.
Market competition is another factor. While DeepSeek offers unique advantages, numerous models compete for market share. The success of an investment in DeepSeek-based ventures depends on the ability to differentiate and capture significant market share before competitors overshadow its advantages.
Investors should also assess the management teams' capabilities in navigating the complex regulatory environment surrounding data privacy and cross-border transfers. The ability to comply with diverse regulations while maintaining operational efficiency will significantly influence AI ventures' success and growth potential.
Corporations
Corporations face a complex landscape when considering the adoption of advanced AI models like DeepSeek-R1, LLaMA 3.3, GPT-o1, Claude Sonnet 3.5, and TII Falcon. Integrating these models into their operations involves balancing the benefits of cutting-edge technology with significant risks and challenges.
One of the most critical considerations for corporations is data privacy and regulatory compliance. DeepSeek-R1's hosted API, which transfers data to servers in China, raises significant concerns under regulations such as GDPR and HIPAA. These regulations often require data to remain within specific jurisdictions or ensure stricter safeguards for cross-border transfers. Non-compliance could result in legal penalties, reputational damage, and loss of customer trust. In contrast, models like LLaMA 3.3 and TII Falcon offer more control over data. Falcon emphasizes privacy through local deployment options that allow corporations to maintain control over their data within their infrastructure.
Another key issue is intellectual property exposure. DeepSeek's terms of service allow the company to use user-submitted data for any purpose, which could expose proprietary information. If a corporation uploads sensitive documents or code, DeepSeek could integrate this data into its training processes or share it with affiliates, resulting in a loss of intellectual property protection. Open-source models like LLaMA and Falcon mitigate this risk by using permissive licenses that ensure user data control and reduce the likelihood of unauthorized use.
From a compliance perspective, TII Falcon's Apache 2.0 license makes it more enterprise-friendly. It aligns with regulatory standards and ensures companies can adopt the model without violating legal requirements. Conversely, DeepSeek's cross-border data transfers may conflict with local laws, particularly in regions with stringent data sovereignty regulations. This could complicate enterprise adoption and raise compliance challenges for organizations using DeepSeek's hosted services.
Corporations must also consider the cost efficiency of these models. DeepSeek's open-source nature reduces costs, making it an attractive option for enterprises looking to balance affordability with performance. Similarly, under the Apache 2.0 license, TII Falcon is cost-effective and accessible, making it an attractive option for companies looking to balance affordability with performance. In contrast, proprietary models like GPT-o1 and LLaMA 3.3 offer versatility and cutting-edge capabilities but come at a higher cost, making them less accessible for some users.
Scalability is another important factor. DeepSeek-R1's massive scale and advanced features make it a powerful tool for complex tasks, but its size and computational requirements may be overkill for some applications. With its smaller size and resource efficiency, Falcon offers a more scalable solution for enterprises with varying needs. Additionally, DeepSeek's knowledge distillation framework allows for smaller, more specialized models, enabling corporations to deploy tailored solutions without the overhead of the entire model.
Integration and compatibility with existing systems are crucial for corporations. DeepSeek's compatibility with other tools and infrastructure is a key consideration, as seamless integration is essential for maintaining operational efficiency. If the model is too complex to integrate, regardless of its capabilities, it may not be worth the investment.
The model's and its developers' reputation and trust are also significant concerns. Allegations of unauthorized data usage by DeepSeek could lead to legal challenges and reputational damage for corporations that adopt it. Ensuring the model aligns with ethical standards and data privacy regulations is crucial to maintaining customer trust and avoiding potential PR crises.
Finally, corporations must consider the competitive advantage that these models can provide. By leveraging DeepSeek's unique features, such as its multi-stage reinforcement learning and Multi-Head Latent Attention, corporations can differentiate themselves from competitors who rely on more traditional or proprietary models. However, this advantage must be weighed against the potential risks and challenges associated with the model.
In conclusion, corporations must carefully evaluate the strategic implications of adopting DeepSeek-R1 and other advanced AI models. While these models offer significant benefits, including cost efficiency, scalability, and competitive advantage, they also present substantial risks related to data privacy, regulatory compliance, and intellectual property exposure. To fully realize the potential of these models, corporations must implement robust risk management strategies, including audits, legal safeguards, and diversification of their AI portfolio, to mitigate these risks and ensure sustainable growth.
Let’s Wrap This Up
With its MoE architecture and MLA, DeepSeek-R1 challenges proprietary models. While data usage is controversial, the model's problem-solving capabilities make it a compelling choice for specific tasks. Comparisons with LLaMA 3.3, GPT-o1, Claude Sonnet 3.5, and TII Falcon highlight its strengths and trade-offs, underscoring the importance of transparency, compliance, and strategic adoption in AI development.
The journey towards truly open, responsible AI is ongoing. We will realize AI's full potential to benefit society through informed decision-making and collaborative efforts. As we explore and invest in this exciting field, let’s remain committed to fostering an AI ecosystem that is innovative, ethical, accessible to all, and informed.
If you have questions, you can always reach out to me via the chat here in substack.
UPCOMING EVENTS:
Metro Connect USA 2025 Fort Lauderdale FL 24-26 Feb ‘25
2025: Paris, Milan, Romania, Hong Kong, Dublin, London, New Delhi, Netherlands
RECENT PODCASTS:
🔊SAP LeanX: AI governance is a complex and multi-faceted undertaking that requires foresight on how AI will develop in the future. 🎙️https://hubs.ly/Q02ZSdRP0
🔊Channel Insights Podcast, host Dinara Bakirova https://lnkd.in/dXdQXeYR
🔊 BetterTech, hosted by Jocelyn Houle. December 4, 2024
🔊 AI and the Future of Work published November 4, 2024
🔊 Humain Podcast published September 19, 2024
🔊 Geeks Of The Valley. published September 15, 2024
🔊 HC Group published September 11, 2024
🔊 American Banker published September 10, 2024
Unsubscribe
Finding a convenient way to link it up took me a while, but here's how to get to the unsubscribe. https://siliconsandstudio.substack.com/account